|
Return to
Oslet main page
|
Lennard-Jones System
The Lennard-Jones system is still the most popular model
for researchers in statistic mechanics and materials simulations.
The user can investigate gas, liquid, and
solid, and if careful enough, observe gas/liquid/solid interphase
transitions, by playing with such a simple system.
|
 |
|
Pattern Formation
These patterns were actually created from a low-density
Lennard-Jones system. The temperature was set zero at
initial time. A green line was
drawn between any pair of atoms with an interatomic distance
less than a certain length.
I believe that behind these patterns
there could be profound math and physics. (For example, some patterns
could hibernate for a long time, big changes onset suddenly.) What's more,
every time the user changes the size of the atoms, or rezero the temperature
at an arbitary time in the middle of the simulation, the result will
be completely different.
(Note that at some point
the mirror symmetry of the evolution was broken because of the
numerical error of the integrator has reached such a level that
symmetry breaking became visible. Symmetry is a very sensitive
property of the system. Once it is broken, it can never be
recovered. And no matter how small the numerical error is, it will
sooner or later break the symmetry, considering the fact that a numerical
error is unlikely a symmetrical one. Although the symmetry
breaking in the time evolution may not be good, it is after all a nice test
---at least it shows to people that running our molecular dynamics
is a high performance integrator.)
|
|
Osmosis
In the above screenshots,
the sigma's are chosen such that the membrane is semipermeable.
For simplicity, it was assumed that the left compartment was filled
with pure solvent atoms (completely hypotonic)
and the right compartment was filled with pure solute (completey hypertonic).
Of course, the user can change the concentrations of both compartments
by moving the atoms from one side to the other, or deleting and adding,
with the use of the model editor.
By changing the radii of the atoms, the user can also change the
permeability and investigate the change of osmostic pressure with
respect to that. The membrane model is based on
Computer simulation of the classic experiment on osmosis and
osmotic pressure,
S. Murad and J. G. Powles, Journal of Chemical Physics, 99, 7271, 1993.
(These authors reported that the model could replicate Pfeffer's experiment
on osmosis in semipermeable membranes in 1877 and numerically prove the
van't Hoff equation for osmotic pressure over a wide range of concentrations.)
|
 |
 |
|
Diffusion into Vacuum
This simulation may describe gas molecules
leaking through the wall of a container. By changing the temperature,
the user can feel that the leakage rate increases. By changing the
thickness of the wall, i.e. the number of atomic layers, the leakage
rate will decrease.
|
|
Explosion
Doesn't this process look like explosion?
Explosion starts with huge chemical energy turning into kinetic
energy. Here the initial great kinetic energy was created by the
release of high repulsion energy.
|
|
Condensation, adsorption and evaporation
Let's imagine we have a vapor in a container with a
cold substrate (here 'cold' means strongly restrained, as they are
restrained, the velocities are smaller). First randomly scatter the
small atoms in the empty part of the container, cool down
the system, the user sees that the atoms aggregate to clusters. Playing
with the temperature slider, the user changes the dynamical behavior.
For instance, after the majority of the atoms have been adsorped to
the substrate, the user can raise the temperature to see how evoporation
happens.
|
|
Phase separation
This shows how the left structure, a uniformly distributed
mixture, can be 'cooked into' the right one, a few separate islands
of atoms. Repulsive cross interactions (customizable)
between the two species were introduced
to keep them apart from each other. Because different types of atoms
'hate' each other, atoms of the same type tend to form blocks.
|
|
Lattice Mismatch
This picture shows the boundaries between three grains of different atoms
and different structures (hexgonal and square). Pay attention to the
lattice mismatching across the boundaries.
|
|
Charged Systems
If you add six A atoms and six B atoms and give the A
atoms positive charges, the B atoms negative charges, and start
running the simulation, you will see this dozen of atoms immediately
conform to a ring, given appropriate
atomic radii for the two species. This was also observed with
the Interactive Physics. In most cases, charged Lennard-Jones particles
prefer rectangular arrangement, as is shown on
the right. (With only the Lennard-Jones potentials,
atoms form hexagonal lattice.)
By playing with this example, the user can understand
why ionic crystals have much higher melting points than crystals formed
by only the Van der Waals potentials, e.g. salt does not melt at high
temperature whereas the inert gas elements
form crystals at very low temperature.
|
 |
 |
|
Polymerization
This is an example to show how different
a physical force the electrostatic potential is from the
Lennard-Jones potential. It shows that the Coulombic
interactions play an important role in polymerization,
which is an important reaction in life science. This series
of pictures show that, with a highly idealized model, how
long chain polymers could form
from small organic molecules (something that the
theories about the origin of life assume).
|
Return to
Oslet main page
|